![]() |
Hong Kong Law Reform Commission |
7.1 We take the view that the best way to protect purchasers is for
purchasers themselves to exercise due care before entering into a transaction.
In this respect, public education is very important. There was general support
in the public responses for Government to launch publicity programmes to educate
the public on the need to exercise due care in buying properties.
7.2 One submission commented that many purchasers are misled by the
name of the preliminary agreement. Purchasers believe that the preliminary
agreement is not important because their solicitors will finalise the terms of
the deal for them. It was pointed out in the submission that this misconception
is sometimes reinforced by estate agents who tell the parties that, if they have
any special requirements, they can ask their solicitors to negotiate with the
solicitors for the other party later. The true position is, however, that if
the special term is not in the preliminary agreement, it will be difficult for
the solicitors later to incorporate such a term in the formal
agreement.
7.3 The submission therefore suggested that parties should be
reminded that the preliminary agreement is a binding agreement and, once signed,
its terms cannot be changed without the agreement of the other party. If the
parties have any specific requirements, they should require them to be included
in the preliminary agreement or consult their solicitors before signing the
preliminary agreement. We agree with the suggestion and have included it in our
recommendation.
|
Recommendation 41
We recommend that the Government should launch publicity programmes to educate the public on the need to exercise due care in buying properties. The publicity programmes should alert the public to the need to: |