HKLII

Hong Kong Law Reform Commission

[Index] [Table of Contents] [Search] [Help]

Annex 2 - Table Comparing the Current Rules with the Proposed Rules in Hong Kong



Current Rules

Proposed Rules

Domicile of children

Domicile (“D”) of origin

  • legitimate: father; illegitimate: mother
  • adopted child: uncertain[631]
  • foundling: D in the country in which it was found[632]

  • D of dependency

  • legitimate: father; illegitimate: mother
  • adopted child: uncertain (see above)
  • legitimated child: D of father[633]
  • D of origin and D of dependency to be discarded
  • no differentiation between legitimate and illegitimate children
  • D in the country with which a child is most closely connected
  • parents D in the same country + child has home with either or both of them, child presumed to be most closely connected with that country, unless the contrary is proved
  • parents D in different countries + child has home with one of them, child presumed to be most closely connected with the country in which the parent with whom he has home is domiciled, unless the contrary is proved
  • “parents” includes adoptive parents
  • Domicile of adults

  • at 18: capable of acquiring D of choice
  • D of choice: residence + intention to reside permanently or indefinitely
  • abandon D of choice by ceasing to reside + ceasing to intend to reside there permanently or indefinitely
  • revival of D of origin
  • at 18 not mentally incapacitated: capable of acquiring D
  • to acquire D: presence in the country concerned + intention to make a home indefinitely
  • to acquire D in HK: lawful presence in HK is required and presence is presumed to be lawful, unless and until the contrary is established
  • to acquire D outside HK, presence lawful or not is one of the factors to be considered by the courts
  • repeal the doctrine of revival of D of origin
  • existing D continues until acquiring another one by choice or by operation of law
  • Domicile of Married women

  • married women's dependent D still applies
  • D of dependency of married women to be abolished

    Domicile of the mentally incapacitated

  • incapacity occurs during infancy: D of dependency continues even after the age of majority
  • incapacity occurs after the age of majority: D last had before incapacity continues so long as he remains incapacitated
  • at 18, D in the country with which he is most closely connected
  • a question of fact as to whether or not a person has the mental capacity to acquire D
  • on recovery, retaining the D last held before the recovery
  • also cover persons in a comatose, vegetative or semi-vegetative state, and anyone who for one reason or another is not able to form the required intention
  • Standard of proof

    higher standard for displacing D of origin

    balance of probabilities for all disputes on D

    Domicile in a federal or composite state

    no specific provision

    present in a federal or composite state + intention to make a home there indefinitely: D in the law district therein with which a person is most closely connected

    Transitional provisions

    no specific provision

  • no retrospective effect
  • D at any time before the commence-ment of the legislation determined as if the legislation had not been enacted
  • D at any time after the commence-ment of the legislation determined as if the legislation had always been in force
  • Codification

    N.A.

  • the legislation should be as comprehensive as possible
  • the legislation should set out the following general rules on D:
    no person can be without a D;
    no person can at the same time for the same purpose have more than one D;
    for the purposes of a HK rule of the conflict of laws, the question of where a person is domiciled is determined according to HK law;
  • a saving provision for the existing common law rules which are not inconsistent with the new statutory rules.


  • [631] It is uncertain whether section 13 of the Adoption Ordinance (Cap 290) would cover the issue of an adopted child's domicile. But it has been suggested that it would be reasonable in principle to say that during the life-time of an adoptive parent the adopted child's domicile was the same as and changed with that parent's domicile.
    [632] This rule is generally accepted, though there is no direct authority to support it. Dicey and Morris on the Conflict of Laws, 13th Ed (Sweet and Maxwell, 2000) at para 6-029.
    [633] No authority can be found on this point. But see Dicey and Morris on the Conflict of Laws (13th Ed, Sweet and Maxwell, 2000) at para 6-092.