The Law Reform Commission

of Hong Kong

Supply of Goods Sub-Committee


Consultation Paper




Contracts for the Supply of Goods





This consultation paper can be found on the Internet at: <http://www.info.gov.hk/hkreform>.




Mr Byron Leung, the Secretary to the Sub-committee, was principally

responsible for the writing of this consultation paper.



December 2000





This Consultation Paper has been prepared by the Supply of Goods Sub-committee of the Law Reform Commission. It does not represent the final views of either the Sub-committee or the Law Reform Commission, and is circulated for comment and criticism only.


The Sub-committee would be grateful for comments on this Consultation Paper by 28 February 2001. All correspondence should be addressed to:



The Secretary

The Supply of Goods Sub-committee

The Law Reform Commission

20th Floor, Harcourt House

39 Gloucester Road

Wanchai

Hong Kong


Telephone: (852) 2528 0472


Fax: (852) 2865 2902


E-mail: hklrc@hkreform.gcn.gov.hk



It may be helpful for the Commission and the Sub-committee, either in discussion with others or in any subsequent report, to be able to refer to and attribute comments submitted in response to this Consultation Paper. Any request to treat all or part of a response in confidence will, of course, be respected, but if no such request is made, the Commission will assume that the response is not intended to be confidential.


Anyone who responds to this Consultation Paper will be acknowledged by name in the subsequent report. If an acknowledgement is not desired, please indicate so in your response.



The Law Reform Commission

of Hong Kong



Consultation paper on

contracts for the supply of goods

_____________________________




CONTENTS



Page





Preface

1



Terms of reference

2

Layout of this Paper

3



1. Existing statutory provisions regulating implied terms in contracts for the sale of goods and for the supply of goods, and the need for further legislation

4



Overview

4

Existing statutory provisions regulating implied terms in contracts for the sale of goods and contracts for the supply of goods

4

The need for further legislation on implied terms for supply of goods

6





2. What are contracts for the supply of goods

11



Overview

11

Introduction

11

Contracts for the transfer of property in goods

13

Contracts of hire of goods

19

Hire purchase agreements

22

What are "goods"

31

Computer software

32





3. Implied terms to be included in the Recommended Legislation – implied terms about title, etc

38



Overview

38

Undertakings as to title under Cap 26

39

Contracts for the transfer of property in goods

40

Contracts of hire

51

Hire purchase agreements

55



4. Implied terms to be included in the Recommended Legislation – correspondence with description

64



Overview

64

Correspondence with description under Cap 26

64

Contracts for the transfer of property in goods

65

Contracts of hire

69

Hire purchase agreements

71





5. Implied terms to be included in the Recommended Legislation - implied terms about quality or fitness

74



Overview

74

Implied undertakings as to quality or fitness under Cap 26

75

Contracts for the transfer of property in goods

77

Contracts of hire

99

Hire Purchase Agreements

109




6. Implied terms to be included in the Recommended Legislation - supply by sample

117



Overview

117

Correspondence with sample under Cap 26

117

Contracts for the transfer of property in goods

118

Contracts of hire

123

Hire Purchase Agreements

126





7. Remedies for breaches of the implied terms

129



Overview

129

Remedies for breaches of implied terms in contracts of sale of goods in Hong Kong

129

Australia

133

New Zealand

135

England and Wales

140

Conclusion

144





8. Exclusion of liability

160



Overview

160

Exclusion of liability in contracts of sale of goods and other contracts for the supply of goods in Hong Kong

160

Australia

164

New Zealand

166

England and Wales

167

Conclusion

170





9. Miscellaneous amendments concerning contracts for the sale of goods

175



Overview

175

Sale of goods forming part of a bulk

176

Rights of partial rejection

203

Statutory exception to the nemo dat rule: sale in market overt

211

Remedies for delivery of wrong quantity

217

Acceptance of goods

220

A reasonable opportunity of comparing the bulk with the sample

223

Concluding observations

224





Annex 1

226



Comparison Table of Statutory Implied Terms in Contracts for the Sale and Supply of Goods

226



Annex 2

227



(1) Complaint Statistics on Hire of Goods

227

(2) Complaint Statistics on Hire Purchase of Goods

227

(3) Complaint Statistics on Contracts for Work and Materials

228


Annex 3

229



Complaint Statistics on Computer Software

229


Preface


__________




  1. The Law Reform Commission issued a report on Sale of Goods and Supply of Services in February 1990.1 Based on the recommendations in the report, three ordinances, namely, the Sale of Goods (Amendment) Ordinance 1994,2 the Supply of Services (Implied Terms) Ordinance (Cap 457) and the Unconscionable Contracts Ordinance (Cap 458) were enacted in 1994.


  1. The Sale of Goods (Amendment) Ordinance 1994 amended the Sale of Goods Ordinance (Cap 26). The major amendments included a new definition of "merchantable quality", and clarification of a buyer's right to reject defective goods where he has not had a reasonable opportunity to examine the goods, even after a sub-sale of the goods. The Unconscionable Contracts Ordinance (Cap 458) empowers courts to give relief in contracts for sale of goods or the supply of services where the contracts are found to be unconscionable.


  1. The Supply of Services (Implied Terms) Ordinance (Cap 457) makes a contract for the supply of services subject to certain statutory implied terms. A contract for the supply of services is defined, among others, as a contract under which a person agrees to carry out a service, whether or not goods are also –


(i) transferred or to be transferred; or

(ii) bailed or to be bailed by way of hire,


under the contract, and whatever is the nature of the consideration for which the services are to be carried out.3


  1. The effect of this definition is that the "service" element of contracts for services is caught by Cap 457 whether or not there is any "goods" element accompanying the supply of the service. The implied terms under Cap 457 (as to care and skill, time for performance and consideration) apply only to the "service" element under such contracts. Cap 26 does not apply to the goods element (if any) under such contracts. It is because Cap 26 only covers goods sold under a contract of sale which is a contract with monetary consideration where the main object of the contract is to transfer, or to agree to transfer, the property in goods to the buyer. In other words, there is no statutory implied term which covers the "goods" element where goods are supplied as part of a contract for the supply of services.

  2. Apart from contracts for the supply of services with ancillary goods mentioned above and contracts of sale, there are other types of contracts for the supply of goods under which property or possession of goods passes. Indeed, there are various types of contracts for the supply of goods (other than sale). For example, there are contracts of barter, contracts of hire, hire purchase agreements, etc. However, as regards implied undertakings by suppliers of goods, they are implied under Cap 26 only in contracts of sale but not other types of contracts for the supply of goods. Hence there are no statutory implied undertakings for contracts for work and materials, contracts of barter, contracts of hire, hire purchase agreements, etc. These contracts are regulated by common law. Although academics and the courts have supported the implication of those obligations in contracts for supply of goods (other than sale), we will see in the following chapters that there remain significant gaps in the law.



Terms of reference


  1. The Secretary for Justice and the Chief Justice have thought it appropriate to review the law governing contracts for the supply of goods and they have referred the topic to the Law Reform Commission with the following terms of reference:


"To review the law governing contracts for the supply of goods and to consider such reform as may be necessary".


  1. On 4 June 1998, the Law Reform Commission appointed a sub-committee to examine the current state of law and to make recommendations. The members of the Sub-committee are:


Hon Mr Justice Bokhary PJ
(Chairman)

Court of Final Appeal

Mr Eric Cheung

Assistant Professor
Department of Professional Legal
Education
University of Hong Kong

Mr Joseph Fok

Senior Counsel

Mr Paul Kent

Assistant Professor
Department of Building & Real
Estate
Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Mr K M Li

Deputy Chief Executive
Consumer Council

Mr Richard Luk

Principal Assistant Secretary
Economic Services Bureau

Mr David Murray

Group Legal Manager
The Dairy Farm Group

Mr Steve Page

Deputy Managing Director
Wayfoong Finance Limited

Mr Adrian Wong

Consultant

Messrs Chao & Chung

Mr Byron Leung

Secretary to the Sub-committee



Layout of this Paper


  1. Chapters 1 – 8 are mainly concerned with contracts for the supply of goods other than sale and in particular, with the terms to be implied in them. There are various types of terms which can be implied in contracts for the supply of goods. In these chapters, we only discuss the implied obligations of suppliers in respect of the goods. We review the existing law on supply of goods in Hong Kong and then consider the positions of other jurisdictions to examine how Hong Kong's law on supply of goods may be improved.


  1. We discuss in Chapter 1 the existing provisions regulating implied terms in contracts for sale of goods and the need for further legislation for other kinds of supply of goods (the "Recommended Legislation"). In Chapter 2, we explain the expression "contracts for the supply of goods". In Chapters 3 to 6, we discuss the implied terms to be put into the Recommended Legislation, namely, implied terms about title, correspondence with description, implied terms about quality and fitness, and correspondence with the sample. We then discuss the remedies for breaches of the statutory implied terms in the Recommended Legislation in Chapter 7. In Chapter 8, we discuss the exclusion of liability and the control of it.


  1. In Chapter 9, we discuss various issues concerning contracts for the sale of goods, including sale of goods forming part of a bulk, right of partial rejection, the market overt rule, remedies for delivery of wrong quantity, acceptance of goods and a reasonable opportunity of comparing the bulk with the sample. The relevant provisions in other jurisdictions on these matters prompt the discussion.


  1. We would like to point out that the recommendations in this Paper are included to facilitate discussions. We welcome views, comments and suggestions on any issues discussed in this Paper.



Chapter 1


Existing statutory provisions

regulating implied terms in

contracts for the sale of goods

and for the supply of goods,

and the need for further legislation


_____________________________________________





Overview


    1. In this chapter, we discuss the need for further legislation on implied terms for supply of goods (other than sale). We first examine the existing statutory provisions regulating the implied terms in contracts for the sale of goods and then discuss the reasons for further legislation on implied terms for supply of goods (other than sale).


    1. We recommend putting the implied terms for supply of goods (other than sale) into a statutory form – Recommendation 1.




Existing statutory provisions regulating implied terms in contracts for the sale of goods and contracts for the supply of goods


    1. There is no comprehensive code regulating commercial transactions in Hong Kong. The Sale of Goods Ordinance (Cap 26) regulates only sale of goods but not other kinds of the supply of goods. On the other hand, the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap 71) controls exemption clauses in both contracts for the sale of goods and contracts for the supply of goods (other than sale).



The Sale of Goods Ordinance (Cap 26)


    1. In Hong Kong, contracts for the sale of goods are mainly governed by Cap 26. Cap 26 is based on the Sale of Goods Act 1893 of England & Wales which is a statement of the principles derived from decided cases relating to sales of goods at that time. Cap 26 has been updated from time to time following changes to the law in England. Cap 26 was last amended in 1994 when the proposals of the Law Reform Commission in its report on Sale of Goods and Supply of Services were implemented.4


    1. Under Cap 26, a number of terms are implied in contracts for the sale of goods. These implied terms are classified either as conditions or warranties. Which category a particular term falls into will determine the nature of the remedy available for its breach.5 The terms implied by Cap 26 in contracts for the sale of goods are undertaking as to title, etc, correspondence with description and sample, and undertakings as to quality and fitness.


    1. There are many other provisions in Cap 26 which relate to the obligations of sellers and buyers under contracts for the sale of goods, such as provisions as to whether time is of essence and remedies of buyers and sellers on breaches of contractual obligations. These are not the main concern of this Paper and they will only be discussed later where necessary.



The Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap 71)


    1. Cap 71 regulates the extent to which civil liability for breach of contract, for negligence or for other breach of duty can be avoided by means of contract terms. The provisions of Cap 71 follow closely the corresponding provisions of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 of England & Wales.


    1. Section 11(1) provides that a seller's implied undertaking as to title or quiet possession (under section 14 of Cap 26) cannot be excluded or restricted by reference to any contract term. Section 11(2) provides that as against a person dealing as a consumer, a seller's implied undertakings as to correspondence with description or sample, and as to the quality or fitness of goods for a particular purpose (under sections 15, 16 or 17 of Cap 26) cannot be excluded or restricted by reference to any contract term.


    1. Section 12 regulates the exclusion or restriction of liability for breaches of obligations arising by implication of law in contracts under which the possession or ownership of goods passes but which are not governed by Cap 26.6 It is provided that, as against a person dealing as a consumer, the liability in respect of correspondence with description or sample, the quality of goods or their fitness for particular purpose cannot be excluded or restricted by any contract term. Neither can the undertaking as to title or quiet possession be excluded under such a contract term except in so far as the term satisfies the requirement of reasonableness. Hence, the liability for breaches of the terms implied at common law in contracts for the supply of goods (other than sale) cannot, in most cases, be excluded.

The need for further legislation on implied terms for supply of goods


    1. The undertakings implied under Cap 26 only apply to contracts of sale of goods but not other types of contracts for the supply of goods. In Hong Kong, there are no such statutory implied undertakings for contracts for work and materials, contracts of barter, contracts of hire, hire purchase agreements, etc. These contracts are regulated by common law. As we will see in the following chapters, academics support the idea of implying (and courts have been willing to imply), those obligations into contracts for the supply of goods (other than sale). Nonetheless, there is a need to put these implied terms into statutory form for the reasons set out in the following paragraphs.



The pre-requisite for protection under Cap 71


    1. Contracts for the supply of goods are regulated by common law, but exemption clauses in such contracts are governed by Cap 71. Cap 71 regulates exemption clauses occurring not only in contracts of sale,7 but also in other types of contracts for the supply of goods. In this sense, some limited protection is given under Cap 71, which restricts a supplier's ability to exclude or restrict his liability for breaching his obligation. Section 12(1) of Cap 71 provides that "where the possession or ownership of goods passes under or in pursuance of a contract not governed by the law of sale of goods", the section has effect in relation to any contract term excluding or restricting liability for breach of obligation arising by implication of law from the nature of the contract. These contracts not governed by the law of sale of goods include contracts of barter, contracts for work and materials, contracts of hire and hire purchase agreements.


    1. The pre-requisite for such protection is that the court holds that those obligations arise by implication of law. Although courts have been willing to imply those obligations into contracts for the supply of goods (other than sale), for the protection of customers supplied with goods (consumer or not), there is a need to put those supplier's obligations into concrete legislation. Indeed in the 70's, England was in a similar position in this respect to the present situation in Hong Kong. The Law Commission published a working paper on implied terms in contracts for the supply of goods and recommended putting these implied terms into a statute.8 In reciting the fact that the Law Commission has published a previous report on controlling exemption clauses in contracts for the supply of goods,9 the Commission stated:


"[the] report was concerned with the practice of contracting out obligations, not with what those obligations should be. It now seems appropriate, at least so far as English law is concerned, that a thorough review of the scope and purpose of such terms should be made".10


    1. It is of no use to a customer, consumer or not, supplied with goods if there is only a statute restricting the supplier's ability to exclude or restrict his liability for breaching his obligations, but the customer is not sure what those obligations are.



For certainty and clarity of the law


    1. Secondly, there is also a need to put the implied obligations of suppliers into a statute for the sake of certainty and clarity of the law. The following examples can illustrate such a need.


    1. In the case of contracts of barter, as discussed in the following chapters, there are authorities that the terms implied should be the same as those of sellers in contracts of sale of goods, but there are still uncertainties. Before the enactment of the Sale of Goods Act 1893, it was generally supposed that at common law the obligations of suppliers of goods under contracts of barter were the same as those of sellers of goods.11 Accordingly, as the Sale of Goods Act 1893 put the principles of law derived from the cases into a statutory form,12 the Act in its original version should also reflect the legal position on contracts of barter. As Cap 26 was modelled on the Sale of Goods Act 1893, Cap 26 in its original version should also therefore reflect the legal position of contracts of barter in Hong Kong. However, it must be pointed out that there is a view that "[a]part from statute … the rules of law relating to sales apply in general to contracts of barter or exchange; but the question has been by no means fully worked out."13 Therefore, it would seem sensible that the terms to be implied in such contracts should be enumerated and made plain in legislation.


    1. In the case of contracts for work and materials, as discussed in the following chapters, the obligations of suppliers at common law in respect of the materials supplied were generally regarded as the same as those in contracts of sale.14 However, in Gloucestershire County Council v Richardson,15 because of the lack of a statutory formula, the House of Lords was divided as to whether a term as to fitness ought to be implied.


    1. In the case of contracts of hire, terms may be implied in a contract of hire that the bailor has the right to hire out the goods and that the hirer is entitled to quiet possession during the period of hire16 and that the goods are free from undisclosed encumbrances. But, since there is no authority, the law is uncertain. In addition, as discussed in the following chapters, there is uncertainty in the existing law as to the nature and extent of a bailor's obligations regarding quality and fitness for purpose of goods hired out. Although there are some decided cases concerning the implied obligations of a bailor in relation to fitness for purpose of goods, the courts seemed to follow three main lines of thought regarding liability.17 Furthermore, there are few cases on the implied term as to hire by sample or description, though there is some support for the proposition that there should be an implied term as to hire by sample or description.18 The position is unsatisfactorily uncertain.


    1. In the case of hire purchase agreements, as discussed in the following chapters, there is no authority on whether there is an implied term as to quality. Professor R M Goode19 believes that there is "no reason why such a term should not be implied" since the hirer's position has been equated with that of a buyer in respect of other implied terms, namely, title, correspondence with description, quiet enjoyment, etc. Professor Aubrey Diamond has also found it difficult to "see why there should not be such a term at common law".20 Once again, the position is unsatisfactorily uncertain.


    1. From the above examples, it is clear that most of the implied terms of contracts for the supply of goods are far from being certain and clear. Therefore, there is a need to put the implied obligations of suppliers into a statute.



For consistency of the law


    1. Thirdly, for the sake of consistency of the law on supply of goods (including sale of goods), the implied terms should be consistent for each type of supply of goods as far as possible. The implied terms for contracts for the sale of goods are in Cap 26 which makes those terms transparent and certain. The terms for other types of supply are far from certain as illustrated by the above examples. Lord Upjohn once stated that if the law treated implied terms differently in contracts of sale from contracts for work and materials, it would be "most unsatisfactory, illogical, and indeed a severe blow to any idea of a coherent system of common law …."21 The same can be said of the differences between contracts of sale and other types of supply of goods. In order to ensure the consistency of the implied obligations of suppliers in other types of supply of goods, such obligations should be put into a statute.



Expectations of finding the implied terms in legislation


    1. Fourthly, other kinds of contracts for the supply of goods, such as contracts of barter, contracts for work and materials and hire-purchase agreements, are commonly used by customers, consumers or not. It is reasonable for persons supplied with goods under such contracts to expect that they would be protected by similar implied terms to those in contracts of sale. By the same token, as the implied terms in contracts of sale are provided in Cap 26, persons acquiring goods through other types of contracts for the supply of goods would also expect to find the implied terms in a statute. The fact that goods are now commonly supplied to consumers through transactions other than sale adds to the desirability of clear legislative provisions.



Experiences of other jurisdictions


    1. Last but not least, other jurisdictions have already put the implied obligations of suppliers in statutes. A comparison table of statutory implied terms in contracts for the sale and supply of goods is at Annex 1. In Australia, Part V Division 2 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Commonwealth – federal level) ("the 1974 Act") contains implied conditions and warranties in contracts for the supply of goods by a corporation to a consumer.22 Most of the consumer protection provisions of the 1974 Act are expressly limited to the supply of goods by a corporation to a consumer. "Corporation" is defined in section 4(1) and by virtue of section 6, references to a corporation are to be read as including references to a person who is not a corporation.23 "Consumer" is defined in section 4B.


    1. In New Zealand, the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 ("the 1993 Act") implies guarantees in the supply of goods in trade to consumers. The 1993 Act only applies where goods are supplied in trade24 which is defined in section 2(1),25 and does not apply to cases where goods are supplied by auction or competitive tender.26 A "consumer" is a person who acquires the goods of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic, or household use or consumption.27 The rights and remedies provided in the 1993 Act are in addition to any other legal rights or remedies, unless those other rights or remedies are expressly or impliedly repealed or modified.28


    1. In England and Wales, terms as to title, correspondence with description or sample, merchantability, and fitness for purposes are implied into contracts of hire purchase by the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973 ("the 1973 Act"). These terms were further extended to contracts of hire and contracts for the transfer of property in goods by Part I of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 ("the 1982 Act"). Both the 1973 Act and the 1982 Act apply to consumer and non-consumer supplies of goods.


    1. For the above reasons, we are of the view that the implied obligations of suppliers in contracts for the supply of goods (other than sale) should be put into a statute and we so recommend.



Recommendation 1


We recommend that the implied obligations of suppliers in contracts for the supply of goods should be put into a statute, the Recommended Legislation.




Chapter 2


What are contracts

for the supply of goods ?


________________________________




Overview


    1. In this chapter, we explain the expression "contracts for the supply of goods". The first part examines "contracts for supply" while the expression "goods" will be discussed in the following part. In particular, we examine three types of contracts for supply, namely, contracts for transfer of property in goods, contracts of hire and contracts of hire purchase. For each of these three types of contracts, we discuss the elements involved, types of transactions not covered, and the legislative treatment of each type in other jurisdictions. We then propose definitions for each type of contract in Recommendations 2, 3 and 4 respectively.


    1. We then turn to the element "goods" and examine the appropriateness of the definitions in the Sale of Goods Ordinance (Cap 26), and the legislation of other jurisdictions. We suggest that the definition of "goods" in Cap 26 should be followed in Recommendation 5.


    1. As computers have now become so commonly used and influential in everyday life, we address the issue whether computer software is "goods". We examine relevant cases in various jurisdictions and conclude that it is preferable to await a more comprehensive study of this topic and make no recommendation accordingly. In this respect, our concern is limited to the implied terms for contracts for the supply of computer software only. Issues such as licensing and copyright are beyond the terms of reference of this Paper and may have to be separately dealt with.




Introduction


Contract of sale


    1. A contract of sale is defined in section 3(1) of Cap 26 as:


"... a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a money consideration, called the price. There may be a contract of sale between one part owner and another."

    1. As a contract for the sale of goods is defined to require both the transfer of title and the provision of money consideration, where either element is missing, the contract is not a contract of sale but may be called a "contract for the supply of goods". A contract for the supply of goods may thus be generally understood as a contract whereby a supplier transfers either possession or ownership of goods to another person for a consideration which may or may not include money.



Other types of supply of goods


    1. Where goods are supplied under a contract but the consideration for the contract is not wholly found in the price of the goods, the contract is not a sale. An example of this type of contract is a contract of barter. As discussed later, at common law, a contract of sale of goods is distinguished from a contract for work and materials.


    1. Contracts which involve money consideration but do not involve the transfer of title in goods are not contracts for the sale of goods. Examples are contracts for the hire of goods and contracts of hire purchase. Under a contract for the hire of goods or a contract of hire purchase, title to goods does not pass. Only possession of the goods passes.


    1. Contracts of barter, contracts for work and materials, contracts of hire and contracts of hire purchase are therefore outside the definition of contracts of sale. Cap 26 does not govern these contracts. In Hong Kong, they are governed by the common law so far as the implied obligations of the suppliers under these contracts are concerned.29


    1. Where goods are transferred for no consideration, the transfer is a gift and not contractual in nature.


    1. In referring to contracts for the supply of goods, we exclude non-contractual transactions (such as gifts) and contracts concerning things other than movable property (such as land and choses in action).



Three types of contracts for the supply of goods


    1. In this Paper, we will consider three types of contracts for the supply of goods:


1. contracts for the transfer of property in goods – under which the supplier transfers property in goods to the person supplied in a manner which, for some reason, does not fall within Cap 26.


2. contracts of hire – under which the supplier transfers possession of the goods to the person supplied for the latter's use and enjoyment without transferring the property.


3. contracts of hire purchase – under which goods are bailed to the hirer in consideration for the payment by the hirer of hire-rent coupled with an option to purchase the goods.



Contracts for the transfer of property in goods


Elements of contracts for the transfer of property in goods


Elements involved


    1. The term "contracts for the transfer of property in goods" by itself means any contract under which a person transfers or agrees to transfer to another the property in goods. This covers various types of contracts, for example, sale of goods, work and materials, barter, hire purchase, etc.


    1. Contracts for the transfer of property in goods for the present discussion should cover contracts under which property in goods is transferred, whether or not services are also provided (for example, contract for work and materials). Since property in goods is transferred, there should be protection by the same statutory implied terms as in a sale of goods contract, even though services are also supplied. In addition, while consideration other than by the presumption by deed is a prerequisite, the nature of the consideration should not matter for a contract to be a contract for the transfer of property in goods. An example of such a contract is one to exchange goods for goods, ie barter.


Transactions not covered


    1. As Cap 26 already regulates contracts for the sale of goods, the present discussion about contracts for the transfer of property in goods does not cover sale of goods. As hire purchase involves hire, with the possibility of later sale, it will be discussed under a separate heading.


    1. In referring to contracts for the supply of goods, we are excluding non-contractual transactions such as gifts. A transaction which is made by a deed (and for which there is no consideration apart from that presumed by a deed) should also be excluded since it is more akin to a gift than to supply of goods, although strictly contractual.


    1. According to section 62(4) of Cap 26, contracts operating by way of mortgage, pledge, charge or other security are specifically excluded from the protection of Cap 26. For example, under a legal mortgage of goods, the property in goods is transferred to secure a debt, but the mortgagor often retains possession of the goods subject to the mortgagee's power to take possession of the goods if the mortgagor defaults on repayment. The mortgagee is not protected under Cap 26. By the same token, contracts for the transfer of property in goods for the present discussion should exclude contracts operating by way of mortgage, pledge, charge or other security.



Two major types of contracts for the transfer of property in goods


    1. There are two major types of contracts for the transfer of property in goods:



Barter


    1. Under section 3 of Cap 26, the consideration for the transfer of property in contracts of sale must be money, the price. Barter is usually understood to mean the trading of goods for other goods without fixing the price. Barter can also refer to the supply of goods in return for services, or for both goods and services. Barter arises when goods (or services or other equivalent30) are specifically traded for goods of another. The parties themselves can agree that the transaction (what might have been barter) takes the form of reciprocal sales, with a mutual set-off of prices and a cash adjustment (if necessary). For instance, goods "for a price to be satisfied by" other goods would be regarded as reciprocal sales, while goods passed "in consideration of" other goods would be regarded as barter.31


    1. Goods are sometimes supplied under a transaction loosely known as "trading in" or "part exchange". This mode of supply of goods is well established and quite common in the motor trade. Goods are supplied in return for some other, usually less valuable, goods, together with the payment of a sum of money. A price is usually fixed for the more valuable goods. A value is then put on the goods to be traded-in. The sum of money represents the difference in value of the exchanged goods. The nature of "trading in" depends on how the facts of each case are interpreted.32



Contracts for work and materials


    1. At common law, a contract of sale of goods is distinguished from a contract for work and materials. The general rule deducible from the cases in which the distinctions were drawn seems to be that if the main object of the contract is the transfer from A to B, for a price, of the property in a thing in which B has no previous property, then the contract is a contract of sale. But if the real substance of the contract is the performance of work by A for B, it is a contract for work and materials even though the performance of the work necessitates the use of certain materials and the property in those materials passes from A to B under the contract.33 In the latter case, the passing of goods is only ancillary to the supply of the services contracted for.


    1. As a result of the distinction, certain contracts of supply34 have been held to be contracts of sale; whereas other contracts of supply35 have been held to be contracts for work and materials. Other examples of contracts for work and materials include contracts to repair a car,36 apply a hair-dye37 and roof a house.38



Other types of contracts for the transfer of property in goods


    1. Some retailers, such as supermarkets, give stamps, coupons or vouchers upon purchase of goods by customers to promote sales or particular products. Sometimes goods are offered in return for the stamps or coupons without the payment of money, and on other occasions goods are offered for a reduced price on surrender of the stamps or coupons which the customer is allowed to trade in as part of the consideration.39 Goods may also be supplied as a bonus to which a customer becomes entitled on purchasing a certain quantity of the products which are being promoted and in some circumstances the transaction merely involves a free gift.40


    1. Sometimes there is a contract for the supply of goods in return for the coupons or labels with or without payment in addition; the contract is either a sale or barter but the distinction is not always clear. For example, in Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd,41 the defendants offered a gramophone record to members of the public for a sum of money together with the tender of three of their chocolate wrappers. The nature of the transaction was not in issue in the case but one of the law lords thought that the transaction was not a sale.42


    1. The case of Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise43 illustrates the difficulties of distinguishing whether a transaction is a gift, a sale or barter. Esso had a petrol sales promotion scheme. Under the scheme, coins were distributed to petrol stations. The petrol station proprietor offered to give away a coin for every four gallons of Esso petrol bought. The issue was whether the coins were being "sold" and were accordingly chargeable to purchase tax. The House of Lords was divided44 as to whether the scheme was a gift, collateral contract or sale.


    1. The importance of distinguishing a gift from a sale or barter is that a person who receives a gift is not protected by the statutory implied terms in the sale of goods legislation. As discussed in the following chapters, the position of barter is uncertain, although terms implied in contracts of sale may be followed.


    1. Promotion tactics such as those referred to in the previous paragraphs are common in retail trade in Hong Kong. In these transactions there is a transfer of property in goods. It is the substance of the transaction which determines its nature, ie whether it is a gift, a sale, a collateral contract or barter. In this Paper, these promotion tactics are included as contracts for the transfer of property in goods if they are not regarded as sales or gifts.


Australia


    1. In Australia, the Trade Practices Act 1974 (the 1974 Act), which stipulates implied terms for contracts for the supply of goods, does not define the scope of contracts for the transfer of property in goods. Instead, it provides in section 4 that:


"supply … includes … in relation to goods - supply (including re-supply) by way of sale, exchange, lease, hire or hire purchase"


    1. Even though it is an inclusive definition, it is not clear whether some types of contract for the transfer of property in goods (for example, the promotion tactics used in retail trade) are covered by the 1974 Act. Contracts for work and materials are covered by section 74 which provides separately some implied warranties for this type of contract. As contracts for work and materials and other types of contract for the transfer of property in goods are common in Hong Kong, it would be sensible for the Recommended Legislation to cover them expressly.



New Zealand


    1. In New Zealand, the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (the 1993 Act), which regulates implied terms for contracts for the supply of goods, does not define the scope of contracts for the transfer of property in goods. Instead, it provides in section 2 that:


"supply … in relation to goods, means supply (or resupply) by way of gift, sale, exchange, lease, hire or hire purchase"


    1. Unlike its Australian counterpart, this is an exhaustive definition and includes supply by way of gift. Section 15 of the 1993 Act provides that the guarantees in the Act apply whether or not the goods are supplied in connection with a service, and contracts for work and materials are therefore also covered.



England and Wales


    1. In the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 (the 1982 Act), the scope of contracts for the transfer of property in goods is defined in section 1 as follows:


"(1) In this Act in its application to England and Wales and Northern Ireland a 'contract for the transfer of goods' means a contract under which one person transfers or agrees to transfer to another the property in goods, other than an excepted contract.


(2) For the purposes of this section an excepted contract means any of the following –


  1. a contract of sale of goods;


  1. a hire-purchase agreement;


  1. a contract under which the property in goods is (or is to be) transferred in exchange for trading stamps on their redemption;


  1. a transfer or agreement to transfer which is made by deed and for which there is no consideration other than the presumed consideration imported by the deed;


  1. a contract intended to operate by way of mortgage, pledge, charge or other security.


  1. For the purposes of this Act in its application to England and Wales and Northern Ireland a contract is a contract for the transfer of goods whether or not services are also provided or to be provided under the contract, and (subject to subsection (2) above) whatever is the nature of the consideration for the transfer or agreement to transfer."


    1. The definition in section 1 is wide. Professor N E Palmer makes the following comments about the scope of the definition:45


"Sections 1 to 5 affect many different transactions, ranging from contracts of work and materials and exchange to the numerous innominate contracts whereunder a party transfers (or agrees to transfer) his property in goods to another. An obvious example of this residual category is the supply of 'free gifts' or 'bargain offers' which are obtainable by some prescribed act on the part of the prospective transferee, such as the despatch of a coupon or label or the entry into an associated contract with the supplier or a trading acquaintance."



Conclusion


    1. The expression "contracts for the transfer of goods" is widely defined in the 1982 Act and means a contract under which there is a transfer of property in goods. This includes barter and contracts for work and ma